<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Carpe Cakem!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem</link>
	<description>A scrapbook of thoughts on arts, culture and the Christian life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:52:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The latest junk degree: Interdisciplinary Studies by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/03/03/the-latest-junk-degree-interdisciplinary-studies/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1717#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Bwahaha! You got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahaha! You got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The latest junk degree: Interdisciplinary Studies by Wifey</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/03/03/the-latest-junk-degree-interdisciplinary-studies/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Wifey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1717#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Yeah!  Hook me up with a degree in Creative Writing, Early Childhood Development, Musical Analysis, Disability Advocacy, Web Design, English and Animal Science.  Then I&#039;ll go get a job as an Engineer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!  Hook me up with a degree in Creative Writing, Early Childhood Development, Musical Analysis, Disability Advocacy, Web Design, English and Animal Science.  Then I&#8217;ll go get a job as an Engineer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christ the crutch (or not) by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/24/christ-the-crutch-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1697#comment-952</guid>
		<description>I agree. Faith is an emotional crutch of a sort, but that&#039;s only the tip of the iceberg!
How exactly is being propped up by our own petty selves supposed to be an improvement?
The Hahn quote is an even better comeback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Faith is an emotional crutch of a sort, but that&#8217;s only the tip of the iceberg!<br />
How exactly is being propped up by our own petty selves supposed to be an improvement?<br />
The Hahn quote is an even better comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christ the crutch (or not) by luke</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/24/christ-the-crutch-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1697#comment-951</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s plenty of ways to respond ...

In a way, the myopic critics understate their case. Christians don&#039;t use God as an emotional or psychological crutch - we believe He is emotional and psychological life itself.

In addition to psychological issues with authority, I remember an exchange Scott Hahn wrote about between a theology professor and an atheist student. When the student asked, &quot;Doesn&#039;t it seem likely that if there were no God, we would invent the concept of God to comfort ourselves?&quot; the professor responded, &quot;Yes - it&#039;s just as likely that if there were a God, we would invent the concept of no God to comfort ourselves.&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s plenty of ways to respond &#8230;</p>
<p>In a way, the myopic critics understate their case. Christians don&#8217;t use God as an emotional or psychological crutch &#8211; we believe He is emotional and psychological life itself.</p>
<p>In addition to psychological issues with authority, I remember an exchange Scott Hahn wrote about between a theology professor and an atheist student. When the student asked, &#8220;Doesn&#8217;t it seem likely that if there were no God, we would invent the concept of God to comfort ourselves?&#8221; the professor responded, &#8220;Yes &#8211; it&#8217;s just as likely that if there were a God, we would invent the concept of no God to comfort ourselves.&#8221; <img src='http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Church social dynamics by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2009/11/05/church-social-dynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1493#comment-943</guid>
		<description>For just a taste of some of the politics that fueled the reformation (completely outside of theological reasons!), check out this:

http://www.leithart.com/2010/02/16/buying-loyalty/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For just a taste of some of the politics that fueled the reformation (completely outside of theological reasons!), check out this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leithart.com/2010/02/16/buying-loyalty/" rel="nofollow">http://www.leithart.com/2010/02/16/buying-loyalty/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Bible is true, but still literature by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/10/the-bible-is-true-but-still-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1662#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Haven&#039;t heard of this one, but I&#039;ll add it to the list. Looks like one of those dangerous unorthodox authors. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Haven&#8217;t heard of this one, but I&#8217;ll add it to the list. Looks like one of those dangerous unorthodox authors. <img src='http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Bible is true, but still literature by Tim</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/10/the-bible-is-true-but-still-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1662#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Northrop Frye?   Though more &quot;The Bible as LITERATURE&quot; than &quot;The BIBLE as literature&quot;, I feel like I am reading a learned and serious man in Frye.  

http://www.amazon.com/Great-Code-Bible-Literature/dp/0156027801/ref=pd_rhf_p_t_1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Northrop Frye?   Though more &#8220;The Bible as LITERATURE&#8221; than &#8220;The BIBLE as literature&#8221;, I feel like I am reading a learned and serious man in Frye.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Great-Code-Bible-Literature/dp/0156027801/ref=pd_rhf_p_t_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Great-Code-Bible-Literature/dp/0156027801/ref=pd_rhf_p_t_1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hart and Girard: Unworldy tenderness sown in human consciences by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/03/hart-and-girard-unworldy-tenderness-sown-in-human-consciences/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1627#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Haha! That&#039;s hilarious about Girard. Absolutely right though. That&#039;s why he&#039;s so hard to explain - no good one liners. He really only works in large chunks. Also, the very nature of his theory is that the big reveal is so obvious we still can&#039;t see it because it&#039;s right in front of our own noses.

That other Hart book sounds great. It&#039;s moving near the top of the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! That&#8217;s hilarious about Girard. Absolutely right though. That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s so hard to explain &#8211; no good one liners. He really only works in large chunks. Also, the very nature of his theory is that the big reveal is so obvious we still can&#8217;t see it because it&#8217;s right in front of our own noses.</p>
<p>That other Hart book sounds great. It&#8217;s moving near the top of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hart and Girard: Unworldy tenderness sown in human consciences by Tim</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/03/hart-and-girard-unworldy-tenderness-sown-in-human-consciences/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1627#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Matt,
Just want to say thank you for blogging about Hart, who I regard with (that word that is not quite worship).   I&#039;d love to hear your thoughts about Beauty of the Infinite, which I thought was genuis.   Nobody else could get away with throwing around so many big words, but somehow Hart is not pedantic; the robustness of his thought really requires those big delicious terms.   I wrote index cards full of new terms and caried them around with me like lozenges.   

As for Girard; I always feel like he&#039;s saying something profound but I&#039;m never sure what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
Just want to say thank you for blogging about Hart, who I regard with (that word that is not quite worship).   I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts about Beauty of the Infinite, which I thought was genuis.   Nobody else could get away with throwing around so many big words, but somehow Hart is not pedantic; the robustness of his thought really requires those big delicious terms.   I wrote index cards full of new terms and caried them around with me like lozenges.   </p>
<p>As for Girard; I always feel like he&#8217;s saying something profound but I&#8217;m never sure what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hart and Girard: Unworldy tenderness sown in human consciences by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/2010/02/03/hart-and-girard-unworldy-tenderness-sown-in-human-consciences/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moscowcoffeereview.com/carpecakem/?p=1627#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

That&#039;s encouraging to hear. I&#039;ve got to check out that Hart book you&#039;ve mentioned. I decided (after years) to take a class at the university this spring (Music Analysis), and I&#039;m finding that my own vocabulary for talking about aesthetics is almost zero.

I also agree that Girard has gotten WAY better with time. His most recent stuff is much more developed than when he was making a stir in the late 70s. Also easier to read!

Blessings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s encouraging to hear. I&#8217;ve got to check out that Hart book you&#8217;ve mentioned. I decided (after years) to take a class at the university this spring (Music Analysis), and I&#8217;m finding that my own vocabulary for talking about aesthetics is almost zero.</p>
<p>I also agree that Girard has gotten WAY better with time. His most recent stuff is much more developed than when he was making a stir in the late 70s. Also easier to read!</p>
<p>Blessings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
